How can you transcend the average player in your industry? How can we be the Deliberate Innovators that break out of the predefined rules to change the game?
We explore the HOW in our second Episode of The Deliberate Way where Dan Seewald is joined by Dr. Stan Bernard, author of the international award-winning book: Brand’s Don’t Win.
0:00-3:51 Introduction
3:52- 6:40 “”Brands Don’t Win””
6:41-12:04 Starbucks and Branding
12:05- 17:51 Transcenders
17:52- 22:23 What Changed His View of Branding?
22:24-29:20 How To Make Sure People Hear You as a Transcender
29:21 -33:34 Audience Questions
33:35- 39:28 Speed Round (Rule Maker or Rule Follower)
39:29-42:36 Practical Application
42:37-43:40 Concluding Thoughts
Stan is one of the most established and well-known experts in the world of competition consulting. When Stan isn’t out writing best-selling books, he is working with Fortune 500 clients. He is the founder of Bernard Associates, a bespoke competition advisory firm where he has worked with more than 150 companies across six continents. Stan is also a former senior fellow at the Wharton School of Business, and he lives in the greater Washington D.C. area.
Brand-washed
Brands Don't Win
Communicate Your Agenda
Play Your Own Game
Shake off the Brand-cuffs
Starbucks
Welcome to the deliberate way. I’m Dan Seewald and in today’s episode...
0:02
all right ladies and gentlemen great to be with you here this afternoon good
0:08
morning good afternoon maybe even a good evening for you I’m Dan seawald you
0:14
might know me from such programs as the deliberate Innovation and also the
0:20
deliberate way I’m going to be here with you today bring you a really awesome program so we’re going to get ourselves
0:27
started here in just one moment um what I’m excited to be able to bring
0:32
with you today is our second episode really the best one
0:39
um the deliberate ways you might know is both a philosophy and also a podcast and
0:45
our intentions to explore in each and every episode The systematic way the
0:51
great problem solvers great thinkers performers athletes business Minds go
0:56
about doing things a little bit different from the rest so by uncovering
1:01
these obvious ways and maybe sometimes not so obvious ways how people who are
1:07
transcenders the Renegades the rule Breakers how they operate we can learn a
1:12
thing or two we can apply those insights to our very own personal and
1:17
professional worlds so I’m excited to to have you a part of this and with that I
1:24
have a super fascinating guest with me today now I’m going to tell you all
1:29
about Stan Bernard but when I think of rule Breakers deliberate innovators transcenders I think of people
1:36
just like Stan now if you haven’t met Stan before you’re going to meet him but let me tell you a few things about Stan
1:43
Stan is one of the most established and well-known experts in the world of
1:49
competition Consulting now you may not know a lot about competition Consulting but you’ll hear a little bit about it he
1:56
is also the author of The recently published book called Brands don’t win
2:01
which has got 10 National and international book awards and he’s been
2:07
recognized as having the number one Business book of 2021 and it also into
2:13
2022 so Stan not too shabby I’m gonna hold your book up we’re not selling them
2:18
out the door but you can go out and get yours when you’re ready I’m excited for us to talk about it now when Stan’s not
2:24
out selling best-selling books he’s working with Fortune 500 clients he’s
2:29
the founder of a company called Bernard Associates where he does that type of competition Consulting work and you know
2:35
Stan has been all over the world including in Pennsylvania I know you
2:40
probably think that is where the world starts and stops um in Pennsylvania he was at the Wharton
2:45
School of Business working as a senior fellow and today he lives in the Washington DC area doing all sorts of
2:53
amazing and intriguing work stand awesome to have you here and I can’t wait for us to chat
2:59
excellent Dan pleasure to be here talking to you today yeah and for our folks who are listening
3:05
um we have a couple things for housekeeping just to let you know first off you have a chance to have your say
3:10
we’re gonna have a little bit of q a um you’ll have a chance to be able to put in whenever you like in LinkedIn
3:16
live a q a or a question for us to do q a we’ll have it moderated so drop them
3:22
in as they come to your mind because there is no moment of inspiration better than the one that strikes you so we’ll
3:28
we’ll bring that in we’ll also be spending a bit of time together today probably no more than 20 of the hour
3:36
whatever the hour may be for you so if you go off to grab some lunch and come back you may have missed the whole thing
3:42
so have your lunch have your snack have your morning coffee if that’s what you’re having you don’t want to miss out
3:48
on what we’re going to talk about here today now Stan I I got to start off with
Brands Don’t Win
3:54
my first question for you and I have to be a little provocative your book Brands don’t win
4:02
it’s a pretty controversial title if you ask me because I mean I grew up learning
4:07
graduate school undergraduate school and business branding wins recent trout Seth
4:13
goaden Peter Drucker it was all about building sustainable durable band Brands
4:19
and you’re telling me now that Brands don’t win what’s this all about get us started and tell me a little bit about
4:25
this uh this real provocative idea that you put out in your book well the title Dan is actually meant to be provocative
4:32
it’s meant to challenge the assumption that most businesses and business professionals have which is the only way
4:39
to compete and win in business is branding well I’m here to say that unfortunately
4:45
most of those businesses and business professionals have been brainwashed wait
4:50
did you think you said brand washed I said brainwashed that was pretty good branding yeah so the idea is that most
4:58
people believe that branding is the only way to compete okay and what I mean by Brandy um everybody knows pretty much
5:05
that these types of companies use the traditional branding Playbook or product
5:11
playbook in which they create a brand then they differentiate the brand based
5:17
on Superior features and benefits over their rivals and then they support it with lots of advertising promotions
5:23
sales reps well I’m here to tell you that there is an alternative in fact a better way to
5:29
compete than branding and that is what I refer to as the trans singer system and I’ll talk more about
5:35
the transgender system but um many of the best and leading
5:41
companies in the world such as Nike Starbucks apple Amazon and many others
5:46
actually do not play The Branding game they use branding but that’s not how
5:51
they win they basically create and play their own game
5:58
so this is a true paradigm shift the idea that you don’t have to play the
6:03
same branding game that by the way is 3 000 years old I mean branding was used
6:09
by the ancient Greeks and 800 BCE in the Agora Marketplace in Athens okay and
6:15
we’ve been using this same identical game for over 3000 years put that in
6:21
context Dan I mean people don’t use the iPhone one and that’s only 15 years old and they certainly don’t use landline
6:28
phones or eight-track tapes and yet we’re using a system for competing and virtually every company on the planet is
6:34
doing this the I thought they would even use the iPhone 7 anymore right exactly man it’s lost but let me let me pause
Starbucks and Branding
6:41
you for one second Stan because I I like what you’re laying down I’m picking it up but let me you mentioned Starbucks
6:47
for example um you know how do we work the Midtown Manhattan for a number of years I
6:53
couldn’t go a block without somebody proudly walking by with their Starbucks cup of coffee with the logo the brand
7:01
emblazoned on it like it wasn’t a regular cup of coffee if you didn’t have Starbucks it was a point of Pride that’s
7:07
branding isn’t it so Starbucks actually tried to win with branding for the first 16 years of its
7:14
existence from 1971 to 1987 they had the Starbucks name
7:19
the iconic Nordic siren logo and of course their branded coffee cups everybody knows the Starbucks brand
7:28
but they weren’t winning they were only adding one store per year so in 1987 Howard Schultz bought the
7:34
company and he said I’m not going to play The Branding game I’m not going to try to differentiate my
7:41
dry roasted coffee I’m going to totally change the game he changed the game with three words
7:46
the third place he said I’m gonna make Starbucks the third place between home
7:52
and work in America this is why of course you have a Starbucks on one side of the highway on the way to work on the other side of the
7:58
highway on the way home from work he was basically saying we don’t want you to Simply grab a cup of coffee we want you
8:05
to grab a chair hang out enjoy staying at Starbucks on
8:10
the way to work on the way home from work and his three-word what I call campaign agenda very much like
8:16
politicians the third place he basically everything they do supports
8:21
that campaign agenda so it’s not just a marketing slogan okay because the transgender system that I’ll discuss
8:28
it’s a full corporate system company-wide system that everybody has
8:33
to believe in and align to and communicate so that’s why Starbucks has
8:39
extremely comfortable chairs they spend more on training than they do on Advertising promotions and despite that
8:47
they actually sell more coffee in the U.S despite the fact that Dunkin Donuts
8:53
actually spends three times as much on Advertising promotions Duncan um Starbucks sells twice as much coffee
8:59
well you definitely see duck and they’ve they’ve gone into even rebranded Duncan just to call it Duncan to transcend
9:05
Donuts but coming back to Starbucks for a moment um Schultz I mean he’s usually a lot as
9:12
being a real Visionary but if I remember correctly he worked for Starbucks so he
9:17
was one of the guys inside but he didn’t last that long tell me a little bit more
9:23
I don’t know how much you dug into to Schultz and Starbucks it’s a curious one yeah in fact it’s one of the case
9:29
studies in my book Brands don’t win one of the 16 case studies Schultz actually worked for Starbucks
9:34
for a number of years he was actually the head of marketing at one point in the early 80s when he was working for
9:40
Starbucks he went to Italy to look at how different people drank coffee in different countries it was in Milan and
9:46
espresso coffee bar and he realized that it was really a center of community
9:52
that people would go to this to the coffee shop in Milan their favorite coffee shop on the way to work on the
9:58
way home from work and they knew everybody and it was very collegial and they hung out as opposed to an American
10:04
types of coffee shops where you know people would literally grab a cup of coffee and go right so he came back to
10:11
Starbucks management and proposed the idea let’s let’s make more of this concept of what he referred to as the
10:17
third place and Starbucks management said no no way no way well I’m gonna I’m
10:22
gonna guess Dan like that’s Starbucks sold coffee that’s that was their thing
10:28
and that’s not easy to Pivot from so I don’t I can’t imagine there were that reception although today you’d never
10:34
know it you would never know it by looking at something you know this is this is what’s interesting because Schultz then came back in 1987 years
10:43
later and said I am going to I believe so much in this concept of the third place I’m gonna buy Starbucks so he
10:51
bought Starbucks and instead of adding one store per year which is what they were doing because
10:56
they couldn’t quite frankly differentiate their dry roasted coffee there were so many coffee shops in the Pacific Northwest and as many people
11:02
know Starbucks coffee is not the best coffee on the planet wait hold on don’t say that I know so what did he do
11:09
they’re okay if you like burnt coffee so he then basically in executed on this
11:16
agenda the third place making sure his stores were in strategic locations corporate hubs malls
11:23
um centers um he also made the stores much bigger so he really Americanized the Italian
11:29
concept and he made it so they were so welcoming the Baristas were trained everybody you know in the all the
11:36
employees were there to welcome you and as a result over the next 20 years
11:42
they went from adding one store per year to adding 1350 stores per year that’s almost four
11:48
stores per day wow they became the dominant player in coffee chains in the world with 31
11:56
000 stores across 80 countries the next biggest competitor is one third
12:02
of their size you know they don’t stand up I I have to just sorry to interrupt you a couple things that I heard you
Transcenders
12:08
mentioning and I’m curious your take on are these defining characteristics
12:13
Schultz went outside of what the norm was he he went outside of the coffee
12:19
shop he went outside the industry went outside the country he also was curious he was looking at what’s out there which
12:26
sounds easy to do but when you’re steeped in your pattern of thinking and
12:31
that’s your job it’s hard not to be an expert it’s hard to look outside but um I’m
12:36
curious defining characteristics are there other things that you think not just about Schultz but but about the
12:43
so-called transcenders that you feel stand out uh that that really are kind of like those markers you’d look for
12:49
yeah so transcender professionals and uh and by the way they don’t have to be the CEO
12:56
of the company they can be at any level the company any function any Market I’ve seen people
13:01
in you know lower you know um you know supply chain jobs legal
13:08
regulatory product development all types of people can become transcenders I think there’s two different types
13:13
there’s the trend centers that are natural trans centers Schultz Jeff Bezos and many other people like that are
13:19
absolute natural transcenders and then you have others that learn to become
13:24
transcenders over time okay so for instance in my workshops I will train people on the transgender system and
13:31
maybe maybe I’ll take a step back and explain what I mean at a high level with the transgender system is so people
13:36
understand it so in the transgender system you don’t win by Leading with your brand
13:43
okay and you don’t use the traditional product Playbook instead you use a political Playbook use the same type of
13:51
Playbook that you you as presidential candidates use so for instance in 2008 Obama didn’t lead with vote Obama he led
14:00
with the word one word campaign agenda or game as I refer to it of change
14:06
and then he followed with the brand he was the brand so if you believed in change then and were inspired by it then
14:13
you would vote for Obama because he was the change candidate that was his positioning and everything Obama did was
14:19
about change his policies whether it’s Health Care Iraqi War policy monetary policies they
14:25
were all about change the way he ran his candidacy was all about change he relied
14:31
heavily on the internet and volunteers unusual at that time
14:36
and of course his background has changed so everything he did was about change so if you believed in change he was the
14:43
change agent you voted for him and of course we saw the same thing happen in 2016. everybody knows Trump’s forward campaign
14:50
agenda or game make America greater yeah he could have said vote Trump because he was a known brand
14:57
but he didn’t he led with make America great again and then if people believed
15:03
in and were inspired by that then he would follow with vote Trump right so
15:08
these companies do the same thing well let me ask what just to peel that back for a moment yeah it’s sort of like
15:15
the traditional parlance I would have called that positioning where you want to be in the position of somebody’s mind
15:21
we want that that subtle place to be lodged in to think about make America
15:26
great or change and to be associated with that candidate or that product that brand Etc is that not positioning or
15:33
yeah help me understand that one a little bit so this is where again the
15:38
transcender system is different in virtually every way from the traditional product Playbook and here’s an example
15:45
so that is the idea of creating an agenda is actually not positioning per
15:51
se it’s called cognitive framing it’s based on cognitive science the idea is you
15:57
force people to look through your frame of reference if they look through your
16:02
frame of reference so for instance if people would want to look through the frame of reference in the case of Obama
16:08
change or Trump make America great again or in the case of Starbucks the third place then they will see what you want
16:15
them to see Starbucks wants you to see a store that’s welcoming that’s got comfortable chairs and couches nice
16:22
music plenty of space free Wi-Fi you know welcoming at Baristas Etc so then
16:28
you then basically play your game but it’s called creating the agenda or
16:34
cognitive framing then you follow with the positioning of the brand you don’t
16:39
lead with it so here’s the very important difference Dan in the traditional model brand was the
16:47
lead actor in the transgender system it’s a supporting actor you still use branding
16:53
we still Starbucks absolutely uses its branding cups its brand and name it’s its logo but they don’t win with
16:59
branding and they don’t lead with it they lead with an agenda which is the game that the company plays and it’s not
17:06
just a marketing sales slogan it’s a corporate wide way to compete and win so
17:13
I see a couple of things are a really important distinctions here is that I like your point the brand you know we
17:20
always LED with brand brand is still there it’s still important but it’s not the single most important thing that’s
17:27
right so I’d love to get Seth Godin on I have them right over I do not have them right here but there are a lot of people
17:34
built their careers on that um I do want to hold that thought for one second Stan because
17:41
um I want to remind folks you have an opportunity to ask questions put them out there we’ll moderate them when about
17:46
you know five eight minutes answer so will pause so you have your say but I do
What Changed His View of Branding?
17:52
want to just kind of wind back a little bit a little bit of a pivot for us um before we we you know went live we
17:59
had a quick conversation about your own personal experiences I noticed you
18:04
didn’t have a traditional Northern New Jersey accent and uh I know you’re originally from Tennessee and uh we
18:12
talked about your experiences in your childhood how that kind of shape even this kind of like this this process your
18:19
your approach tell us a little bit about like what happened you’re a child that absolutely disrupted the way you thought
18:27
about branding and Leadership well it wasn’t a traumatic childhood
18:32
I’ll tell you that but um I was a big Vanderbilt fan okay
18:38
Commodores Nashville Commodores I was the ball boy for the Vanderbilt basketball team for eight years my father started the national Commodore
18:44
Club etc etc so we were a huge band of fans but every year we go to the Alabama football game versus Vanderbilt and
18:50
literally by halftime we were getting blown out you know usually it was 31 to 3 or 28 nothing or whatever it was and
18:56
the game was over and so I remember at seven years old I asked my father I said why does
19:02
Vanderbilt every year lose so badly to Alabama they’re both playing the same
19:07
game of football why are they why does Vanderbilt always lose and he said to me well
19:13
Alabama’s led by Bear Bryant at that time who was the winningest coach in football until recently Nick Saban who
19:19
surpassed him the current Alabama coach and my father said he basically Bear Bryant seems to have a system where he
19:26
uses player Recruitment and Player Development to win the game before he
19:31
even plays the game and that really stuck with me because from that point forward I was not just
19:38
watching games to see who won I was watching to see how the teams how they
19:44
won not just who won how they won and I realized in sports As I Grew Older that
19:50
there were systems for winning obviously power Bear Bryant later Nick Saban with his two-word agenda of the
19:58
process at Alabama okay that football team as you know he’s won seven national titles the most they’ve done okay yeah
20:05
they’ve done okay Bill Belichick his mentor used the system basically do your job three-word
20:12
agenda okay um and you can go on and on Moneyball and baseball that helped the Cubs help
20:18
the Sox help the Astros all win World Series right so I knew there were winning systems in
20:23
sports so when I went to business school at Wharton I basically would say to my
20:29
marketing Professor you know I see you’re teaching branding but what are the other ways to win besides branding
20:34
what are the other systems for winning because I know there’s multiple systems in sports and he looked at me like I was from Mars right I got to Bristol-Myers
20:42
Squibb which is a consumer Products Company pharmaceutical company Etc very heavily focused on branding and again
20:48
when I was a brand manager they said you know I said hey I see that there’s one approach you’re using here it’s only the
20:54
only approach you’re using is branding trying to differentiate our brand um let’s talk about other ways other
20:59
strategies for winning and they looked at me again like I was for Mars so I at
21:04
that point realized I wanted to create a winning system for business which
21:10
ultimately over the last 35 plus years I have developed the transgender system which I describe in detail in the book
21:16
Brands don’t win but it’s all about using a political Playbook you create
21:23
your agenda that is you create the game it’s a game that only you can win
21:29
you then communicate the agenda tell the marketplace over and over what your game is so that they see it through your
21:35
frame of reference or your game and they play your game and third you Champion the agenda with
21:41
three different excuse me four different types of winning actions okay so that’s all I’ll explain in the book it’s a
21:47
simple system but the most important thing Dan is if you just want to compete then brand you
21:54
have plenty of you know company it’s like playing brand Checkers because most you know most companies and most people
22:00
are brainwashed but if you want to win then transcend use the world’s most powerful system the
22:08
train Center system for winning so I’m gonna let me unwind this a little bit and we’re going to take questions and
22:13
I’m gonna ask one more question and then turn it over to other folks I have a host of other questions that I’d like to
22:19
ask you Stan but I want to give some air time to others as well um so my the question I have before we
How To Make Sure People Hear You as a Transcender
22:25
take others you know this idea about being a transgender or a rule breaker somebody
22:32
who who kind of challenges the orthodoxies and the Norms of the way things are done it’s not easy it’s not
22:39
easy I mean you give the example like Howard Schultz was successful and and it was happily ever after but there are
22:45
plenty of examples where people have you know tried to change a game and they got beaten up for it
22:52
um you know Steve Sasson Kodak famous story about him having discovered the DSLR and they said let’s shelve it
22:59
um there’s a lot of other examples out there in the social space Social advocacies Sports where they were
23:05
dismissed it’s not easy to be a rule breaker how do you if you are one of
23:11
these folks who are changing the way the game is played how do you make sure that that people hear you
23:16
um yeah so you’re not just a footnote because nobody likes to to challenge convention truly we talk about it in
23:22
hindsight how do you do it yeah this is a great question um first of all let me distinguish
23:27
between rule breaking and Rule making yeah in the transgender system you’re not
23:33
rule breaking you’re making the rules because you’re creating a game only you
23:39
can play and win so again getting back to Starbucks it was all about having the the nicer bigger stores and the right
23:45
locations with the right training of their employees Etc so they were creating the rules
23:51
that made other companies as well as the rest of all their stakeholders regulators and others
23:57
follow their game and play their game okay so that’s an important distinction these are rule makers they are playing
24:03
the game now you talk about it not being easy it’s not easy initially
24:08
okay to change the mindset because quite frankly as I said earlier you know
24:13
people have been doing branding and using this model for 3000 years virtually every executive every professional business professional has
24:19
either been taught or trained it’s all about money with branding so the first thing you have to do is be open-minded
24:25
enough to accept that there’s got to be more than one way to compete I mean think
24:32
about that we go to Starbucks and you can order any one of a hundred and
24:37
seventy thousand different types of drinks have you ordered all of them yet not yet I’m working on it I’m working on
24:44
it but when it comes to competing you walk into the store and you there’s only
24:49
one way to compete it doesn’t make sense so I think first of all people have to
24:54
just we have to debunk that myth that branding is the only way to win so that’s the first part that and quite
25:00
frankly when I do my workshops that’s one of the most important pieces is to get people just to look through the
25:06
frame of reference that I’m providing them which is you don’t have to look through the brand the very limited brand
25:12
frame it’s almost what I call the brand jail you have to break out of the brand jail shake off the brain cuffs and
25:20
basically you know get to where you’re not brand washed I want to I want to play on your analogy for a minute
25:25
because there’s a lot of brand prison wardens and prison guards out there protecting for example uh you know just
25:32
something that I saw literally the other day yesterday at a conference for
25:37
investors they’re they’re these are private Equity Venture funds and every
25:44
company that presented there was a formulaic approach of looking at their customer acquisition model and their
25:50
cost and they said we have to look across everybody exactly the same which begged the question for me if you’re
25:56
measuring everybody with a consistent standard it does make it easier and it’s you really don’t want to Veer from that
26:03
they’re going to Rebel they’re gonna push back if you’re challenging the common metrics the common language it’s
26:10
not easy um it’s more than not easy it’s it’s it’s it’s sort of rehabituating people
26:15
into thinking and doing things differently um what works how do you how do you
26:20
break those habits to get people to look at it differently even if somebody says Stan I don’t love your transcender
26:26
system or the language that you’re using the fundamental premise that there’s more than one way to do things the way
26:33
they’ve always been done is absolutely vital but it’s not easy what are you
26:38
finding from your experience how do you get those prison guards to open up the doors
26:43
yeah you know it’s such an important question because I you know quite
26:48
frankly this is one of the most biggest challenges and opportunities I have with clients which is how do you get people
26:55
to break out of habits okay because we all know we’re most
27:00
humans do not like change however that’s and we know there’s an adoption curve for everything okay for
27:07
all different types of products Technologies including the training center system so it starts with having somebody or
27:14
some people at your company that are willing to say you know what I’m tired of missing sales projections
27:21
I don’t like the fact that we had a failed product launch I don’t like the fact that I’m constantly reacting to
27:27
another competitor and I’m willing to change what we’re doing so that I get
27:32
better results I get successful product launches I meet sales goals and exceed them so that’s where it starts you have
27:40
to be willing to say okay I’m not going to continue doing the same thing over and over again and getting the same
27:45
result which of course is the definition of insanity according to Einstein right so I have found that there’s always
27:52
groups of people within companies big or small whether it’s a one-person company all the way up to you know 100 200 000
27:58
member companies okay there are going to be people that are tired of playing somebody’s else’s game
28:05
they’re tired of losing and so they are open and open-minded to trying something
28:11
else to get a different result so I am usually called in by those types of
28:16
people now they can be any number of different types of people it could be the senior executive it could be a
28:22
junior marketing person it could be a competitive intelligence market research
28:27
product development any number of people that say you know what I wanna I wanna
28:32
win because the transgender model is not about competing because that’s what the
28:38
brand model does the brand model allows you to compete so if you just want to compete continue branding okay but if
28:44
you want to win and more importantly if you want to dominate then you have to be open to trying a new
28:52
system and this is a very simple concept which is you play your own game I mean how many people don’t like to oh
28:58
I mean I can make the rules they love it when they actually see this system and they see the case studies and examples
29:04
of how you can create and play your own game people get excited they get excited
29:10
and they know hey I can win with this I don’t know how to play this game you’re
29:16
you’re you’re seeing the sums of other people and I did promise I was going to
Audience Questions
29:22
moderate a couple of questions we had a couple questions that have come in one was what about if you’re bound to a
29:29
larger institution and you need to follow the rules as a medical provider
29:34
this is the biggest challenge that we have when we’re playing the insurance game now that’s I hear that all the time
29:42
from from Healthcare professionals they gripe about it’s like it’s not the way it used to be you trained as a medical
29:48
doctor many years ago as I recall um how do you answer that like it’s that
29:53
this is a tough situation that’s right so so I have actually done Consulting
29:59
for you know uh product Healthcare products companies pharmaceutical biotech or physician groups hospitals
30:06
insurance companies I’ve basically played all over the healthcare landscape as well as outside the healthcare
30:12
industry many times and again it’s the same thing you have to change the game we have to come up and play a game only
30:18
can win and so we are seeing some versions of that so different search instances medical groups are coming up
30:24
with concierge medicine that’s one model that they’re using to basically play the insurance or stop playing the insurance
30:30
game they’re basically saying we’re not going to play the insurance game I mean my physician just this past year said
30:35
you know what I’m not doing the insurance model at all I’m going to become concierge she’s charging me you know a fee up front but here’s what we
30:42
offer okay that’s one model others are basically getting bigger medical groups they get such big specialty groups or or
30:48
primary care groups that they can then out compete quite frankly against insurance companies because there’s so
30:54
many Summit Health in New Jersey Z and exactly exactly my belief is and I tell
31:01
my I tell my kids this and I tell my clients this find a way to win there’s always a way
31:08
to win so that’s what I do working with clients is to find what is the game or
31:13
the approach and what I refer to as the campaign agenda that you use to win in
31:19
your respective business field there’s another question that came in
31:24
Stan a little different one that you might have heard a couple times before I know I have I work on the commercial
31:31
side and we’re dealing with legal and Regulatory who are paid to say no how do
31:38
I deal with people who have no vested interest to help me play a different
31:43
game I purposely in my workshops in my
31:49
seminars my trans center workshops seminars business war games I purposely make sure that legal Regulatory
31:57
Compliance any of those types of groups are always represented usually at the
32:03
highest levels okay because what I find is their their knee-jerk reaction would
32:09
be oh no we have to play by the existing rules but when they go through these workshops
32:14
and I show them examples of how companies like a Nike like an Amazon like an apple and these other companies
32:21
how they’ve changed the game legally compliantly following regulations
32:27
and they basically have forced that game not only on the marketplace and
32:33
competitors but they’ve also focused their game in a way so that regulators and lawyers and others have to play the
32:40
same game this is this is and I will tell you I get some it’s funny I get some of the best ideas for agendas from
32:47
lawyers and Regulators it’s really funny and they they see it so once you see
32:53
this a big part of this is seeing that the transcender world is round it’s a
32:58
little like oh once we saw a picture of the Earth as round from space right every most everybody pretty much
33:05
everybody said oh I get it the world’s around just about that’s right just about it’s the same thing here once you
33:11
see it you can’t go back to branding you can no longer go back to playing the
33:18
same exact game that this every single company pretty much on the planet uses whether they’ve got a product technology
33:24
service for the last 3000 years no people will then ultimately see it it’s
33:30
like the light bulb goes off and they can’t go back I I hate to say this but we only have a
Speed Round (Rule Maker or Rule Follower)
33:37
little bit of time left so right I want to change the game that we’re playing right now sorry I had to bring that in
33:44
um we’ve just been conversing uh some questions we got a couple questions from the audience but I want to play a quick
33:50
speed round 30 seconds and what I’m going to ask you is is the person I’m going to introduce
33:57
and I’ll give you a bunch of people are they a rule maker are they a rule
34:03
follower and you can even say they’re a rule breaker but let’s say rule maker versus rule follower you ready go all
34:10
right I’m gonna put the first one out there for you first one Jeff Bezos you’re on the clock
34:17
transcender um he basically created his own game
34:25
his game was customer Obsession he never played The Branding game you’ll see you won’t even see the name Amazon on the
34:31
side of the trucks that are delivering your packages today look at the trucks they won’t have the brand name Amazon on
34:36
them I think I know it’s a customer Obsession everything they do everything they do is aligned to customer session
34:42
every metric eighty percent of their measures are customer metrics okay they basically
34:49
Focus solely on customer session they do it better than anybody else in the world
34:54
their Prime program delivery program changed the game it’s considered the most devastating internet program in the
35:00
world for competitors everybody basically had to respond to Prime all right yep I’m gonna throw another one
35:08
out to you yeah this one okay Jeff Bezos everybody knows Jeff Bezos here’s what’s a little more Arcane Harry Hammer carry
35:16
Hammer fashion are you familiar with it you ready yeah Carrie Hammer actually changed the
35:22
game in the fashion industry um in night in 2014 she basically was
35:28
showing her clothes on a New York uh Council fashion runway and at that time
35:34
her clothes were meant for professional middle-aged women quite frankly and the models that she put her clothes on uh
35:41
these young very thin 19 20 year old women didn’t fit Lily and it figuratively didn’t fit for her so she
35:48
basically said you know what I’m not going to play the same game that every other fashion designer does I am going to change the game my game is going to
35:55
be Role Models not runway models she then proceeded to have female Executives
36:00
philanthropists and even a woman who had autism
36:06
um who was one of the models she also had a quadruple amputee that was a model she had a woman in a wheelchair that was
36:13
a model she basically was saying hey it’s not about the runway it’s about real life so her five-word campaign
36:19
agenda was Role Models not runway models she changed the game in the fashion
36:25
industry not runway models I love the play on words with that all right I got another one for you another one a little
36:31
more Arcane um Hans Neiman the chess player
36:37
he uh based on what I understand uh he actually is a rule breaker
36:43
yeah tell me tell me more or tell us a little bit more yeah so he’s admitted to cheating in chess uh he has also had
36:51
numerous reports uh indicating that he has cheated particularly in online chess tournaments he’s like an earpiece or
36:57
something with a little signaling device yeah and so to me that is that is breaking the law okay and I want to make
37:04
a distinction between it’s not making another game it’s that’s breaking the game that’s breaking that’s breaking the
37:09
law okay breaking the rules breaking the law of an existing game whereas transcenders do not do that transcenders
37:16
you create a legal ethical compliant game and then you win that game
37:22
interesting that this is a really important distinction because I I like to think about you have to know the way
37:28
the game is played so you can break the rules but you still have to have a playing field where everybody’s at least
37:34
in agreement about what the the legalities and rules are so it’s an interesting distinction yeah but I I
37:41
don’t even I would say instead of knowing the rules if you’re knowing the rules that means you’re following somebody else’s rules
37:47
and I will tell my clients if you are basically following somebody else’s rules you’re playing somebody else’s
37:53
game and by definition you’re losing so the idea is create your own game you
37:58
create the rules again making it legal ethical compliant but you create your own game you create your own rules and
38:05
you force everybody else to learn your rules that’s the mindset difference because the transgender system is not
38:12
just a system it’s also a mindset all right I got one more for you as time
38:17
allows let’s go into the world of monarchy or x-monarchy Prince Harry what
38:23
do you think about him you know you almost can’t separate him from his wife Meghan Markle so there’s a
38:30
lot of Duo um clearly I think people would agree that in the UK that they have broken the
38:36
monarchy’s rules right um they’re quite annoyed about it it’s yeah I’m lit by these rules it’s right
38:43
that’s right you talk about that’s about his rules oriented as you can get right
38:48
um very true but at the same time I don’t necessarily see the game that he
38:53
and his wife are playing I don’t see a campaign agenda I don’t see a consistent game so I would say there are more rule
39:00
Breakers than uh transcenders right so they’re not actually that that’s an interesting point I’m glad you made that
39:06
one because I I wasn’t sure are they playing a different game or maybe they have a game where just it’s totally
39:11
opaque to everybody yeah and and this is this is important it’s it’s not you know it’s not just not playing by somebody
39:17
else’s rules just because you don’t play that that doesn’t make you a transcendor yeah transgender has to play their own
39:23
game where is I don’t see that with Prince Harry at this point gotcha all
39:28
right Stan I mean it’s hard to believe it’s been 40 minutes but what I’m going to ask you is last couple of thoughts
Practical Application
39:35
people like to walk away with practical application what are a couple things that I can do right now
39:42
um maybe I’ll go do a training maybe I’ll be in a workshop maybe I won’t but I want to walk away with one or two
39:48
tidbits of things I can think about or do right now what are a couple of practical takeaways you can give people
39:54
okay um let’s let’s go with two the first one is the three-step transcender system
40:01
um I describe it in detail in the book obviously you can read the book but the three steps of this you create the
40:06
agenda find a game that only you can play and win for your company and your products second communicate that agenda
40:12
internally so that you get full alignment so everybody understands it every single strategy every single
40:17
action every single metric aligns to it and then Champion agenda with several
40:22
winning actions cross-functional cross-disciplinary cross Geographic the
40:28
second thing I’d suggest to people is this this is very simple and that is when you communicate your campaign
40:35
agenda use five words or fewer the reason for that is that it turns out
40:42
we have lost over the last 20 years 43 percent of our short-term memory
40:48
where did we leave it yeah well we lost it the iPhones and and other devices that
40:55
we rely on we used to be a remember seven plus or minus two chunks of information or digits right for the last
41:01
20 years we’ve lost and and we’re now down to four basically four plus or minus one chunk of information
41:07
so if you want people to remember and more importantly repeat your agenda over
41:13
and over and over again like in the case of a political election change in the case of Obama or make America great
41:18
again in the case of trump you make sure that it’s ideally honestly
41:24
forwards or fewer because some people can’t even remember five words so that’s what I’d recommend
41:30
um in terms of communicating it’s it’s the simple way to think about this is the elevator pitch that’s the
41:36
traditional way you have several floors and you give your brand messaging in the
41:41
transcender world you have the elevator clothes wait hold that elevator
41:46
forwards keep it simple keep it simple keep it concise I like that so forwards
41:53
not even five words and and repeat it over and over this is a big difference
41:59
in traditional marketing we say don’t don’t you know change the marketing every three six months a year
42:05
commercials Etc no don’t do that in the in the Transcendent World in transcender world you repeat your agenda over and
42:11
over again everybody knows Nike’s agenda from 1987. three words
42:16
just do it just do it stand you have been an incredible guest
42:23
and to borrow your expertise I’m going to say the same thing deliberate deliberate deliberate do things very
42:29
deliberately innovate in a deliberate way all right too many words too many too many I’m gonna narrow it down but
Concluding Thoughts
42:37
first of all big thank you for for you coming joining sharing your wisdom you laid some wisdom down on us deeply
42:43
appreciate it I am going to put the book up there Brands don’t win I like the Simplicity of the cover on this too very
42:49
very nicely done simple but also effective big thank you for for coming if anybody
42:55
would like to reach out to Stan you know where you can find them LinkedIn the source of all things business these days
43:03
but for us we’re glad to have you here we will be hosting our next episode
43:09
coming before the holidays the Christmas and New Year’s holidays and you’re not
43:14
going to want to miss that one it’s all about deliberate facilitation how do you do things in a delivery way that other
43:21
people aren’t to be able to get an incredible output in your next Workshop or event so come on you’ll see some
43:27
stuff about that coming up but in the meanwhile big thanks again to Our Guest signing off for now take care everyone
43:34
and have a great rest of your week take care bye
Dan is the Host of the Deliberate Way Podcast and is a professional moderator and featured TED Talk keynote speaker.
When Dan isn’t off interviewing health and wellness pioneers, his is running a Femtech Start-Up business, LiviWell, as well as leading the Innovation Advisory firm, Deliberate Innovation.
Dan is a widely published author in the field of corporate innovation, as well as a contributing writer for multiple journals. And once upon time, Dan was an executive at Pfizer, heading up the World Wide Innovation Group and developing the award winning Dare to Try Program.
Dan did his graduate studies at New York University’s Stern School of Business in Political Economy and Entrepreneurship. And when he is not working, Dan volunteers as a wrestling and soccer coach.